G35 unsafe!!!

ward · 10-28-2005, 05:37 PM

The list of unsafe cars points to two trends. First, the least-safe cars are cheap. However, some luxury cars have subpar crash-test scores. The Jaguar X-Type sedan from Ford Motor and the Infiniti G35 and M model lines from Nissan Motor received one "poor" rating each, which was alarming but not enough to merit placement on our list

taken from
http://biz.yahoo.com/weekend/leastsafe_1.html

wow, watch out for that unsafe japanese car!

deutschmann59 · 10-28-2005, 06:38 PM

It's a shame about how car companies build cars around features rather than safety. Safety should be number one, and I think that's what these reviews are trying to tell car companies. If you're on a budget looking for a new $10,000-19,000 car, that car should be as safe as a safe $90,000 luxury car.

But I guess having more featuers (like with Kia) or larger production output (like with Ford) is more important than safety.

There's really no excuse for an unsafe $40,000 car, though

romeo26 · 11-04-2005, 10:10 PM

thats what makes the e90 worth buying then the g35. for me its better to be safe then sorry, sure your car might be faster then mine, but iam safer!!

JamieA · 11-06-2005, 08:28 AM

I am not surprised at the Jag X-Type's performance seeming as it is built off the humble Ford Mondeo platform.

Broken1 · 11-06-2005, 08:49 AM

The E90 got 5 stars in the Euro NCAP? Right?

Anyone know what it got in the US NCAP?

10-28-2005, 05:37 PM	#1
ward Major General 155 Rep 6,158 Posts Drives: F Join Date: May 2005 Location: T iTrader: (0)	G35 unsafe!!! The list of unsafe cars points to two trends. First, the least-safe cars are cheap. However, some luxury cars have subpar crash-test scores. The Jaguar X-Type sedan from Ford Motor and the Infiniti G35 and M model lines from Nissan Motor received one "poor" rating each, which was alarming but not enough to merit placement on our list taken from http://biz.yahoo.com/weekend/leastsafe_1.html wow, watch out for that unsafe japanese car!
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

10-28-2005, 06:38 PM	#2
deutschmann59 Captain 174 Rep 737 Posts Drives: 2006 325i Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: e90post.com iTrader: (0)	It's a shame about how car companies build cars around features rather than safety. Safety should be number one, and I think that's what these reviews are trying to tell car companies. If you're on a budget looking for a new $10,000-19,000 car, that car should be as safe as a safe $90,000 luxury car. But I guess having more featuers (like with Kia) or larger production output (like with Ford) is more important than safety. There's really no excuse for an unsafe $40,000 car, though
	Appreciate 0 Quote

11-04-2005, 10:10 PM	#3
romeo26 First Lieutenant 43 Rep 354 Posts Drives: e30 325 (no lette) Join Date: May 2005 Location: anaheim, cali iTrader: (0)	thats what makes the e90 worth buying then the g35. for me its better to be safe then sorry, sure your car might be faster then mine, but iam safer!!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

11-06-2005, 08:28 AM	#4
JamieA Colonel 93 Rep 2,168 Posts Drives: G01 X3 M40i Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Adelaide, Australia iTrader: (0)	I am not surprised at the Jag X-Type's performance seeming as it is built off the humble Ford Mondeo platform. __________________ '05 E90 325i \| '06 E90 325i \| '08 E90 325i LCI \| '13 F30 328i M-Sport \| '14 F10 535d M-Sport Current: '19 G01 X3 M40i
	Appreciate 0 Quote

11-06-2005, 08:49 AM	#5
Broken1 Addict 203 Rep 2,074 Posts Drives: 2024 X5 40i M-Sport Join Date: May 2005 Location: Ontario iTrader: (0)	The E90 got 5 stars in the Euro NCAP? Right? Anyone know what it got in the US NCAP?
	Appreciate 0 Quote