View Single Post
      03-06-2013, 02:21 PM   #167
paradoxical3
Lieutenant Colonel
1008
Rep
1,563
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: USA

iTrader: (6)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmw5406spd View Post
You state that a 12.9 1/4 mile time is faster then a Cayenne Turbo S, they rated at 12.5 1/4 mile and 4.3 0-60? I know because I had one..
No, you didn't have one.

From your other thread, cars you claim you owned:

Quote:
2010 Merz GLK 350 Black/Black, AMG
2008 Merz CLK 63 Black Series, Black/Black
2008 VW R32 Blue/Black
2008 Mits EVO Blue/Black
2008 Merz S63 Flint Gray/Black
2007 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Yellow/Black
2006 Merz S65 Black/Black, Renntech 725HP
2006 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Red/Black
2006 Subaru STi Blue/Black, Heavily Modified
2006 BMW M6 Silver/Black
2005 MINI Cooper S Conv Yellow/Blue, Modified
2005 VW Beetle Turbo Conv Cyber Green/Tan
2005 Acura NSX Yellow/Black
2004 Audi S4 Avant, Yellow/Black
2004 Porsche Cayenne Turbo Silver/Gray EVO 550 HP
2004 Merz SL600 Mars Red/Tan, Renntech 645 HP
2004 Merz E55 Silver/Gray, Renntech 585 HP
2004 Merz SL55 Silver/Gray Renntech
2002 BMW M3 Cab
2002 Porsche 996TT Yellow/Black EVO Stage 4, 720 HP
1997 Ferrari F355 Spider Red/tan
1995 Ferarri F355 Spider Yellow/Black
1992 Lamborghini Diablo White/Red
1986 Lamborghini Countach Black/Tan
1986 Porsche 911 Factory Slant Nose Turbo Black/Black
1985 Renault R5 Turbo
1985 Porsche 930 Ruf Turbo
1984 Chevrolet Corvette Bronze/Bronze, Sport Seats, Z51, 4+3 Manual
Even if you're telling the truth, which I doubt, your 2004 Cayenne turbo is equal to a slower than a STOCK X1. 13.8s 1/4 mile and 5.4 seconds to 60.

Further, only the absolute current brand spanking new Cayenne Turbo runs the numbers you posted. Previous models are significantly slower, often not even breaking into the 12's.

Last edited by paradoxical3; 03-06-2013 at 02:31 PM..
Appreciate 0