Quote:
Originally Posted by afadeev
Yes, because getting cars damaged while replacing windshields is NOT at thing.
I've had windshields replaced in multiple cars over the years (mostly BMWs), pre- and post- glued-on structural windshield era. Former were simpler and cheaper than the latter, but both can be done without any damage to the car itself. When done properly and competently.
Perhaps you need to look for another glass shop?
Removing windshield that has been urethan-glued is not hard, usually done with a wire, then cleanup. Trim may, or may not, survive. I usually paid for new trim either way.
This is a bit misleading on two (3) levels:
- Most insurance policies carry separate glass-only coverage with minimum or zero deductibles (frequently state mandated).
- Glass claims are treated as no-fault, thus no premium increases
- Most glass still costs $600-900, unless you have HUD on yours (or you own a Tesla).
Fair point.
YMMV,
a
|
“Most” insurance? Maybe half, at best. USAA does not, many others don’t, many do. I never said they treat it as “at-fault” and raise rates.
Your replacement cost numbers are way down. All the newer drivers assistance stuff has significantly increased windshield replacements across the board. I know Subarus are $1,200-$1,400 glass replacements due to cameras and re-calibrations. G87’s w/HUD are over $2,000. List goes on.
Yes, damage to A-pillars, interior trim, headliner etc is absolutely a thing. Some cars are easier than others, generally speaking, the newer the car, the easier / softer the sealant is to cut through. Multiple cars, multiple different shops, doesn’t matter. Family, friends etc have all experienced this before.
We all go through a LOT of windshields in CO. It’s huge business here. I think you’ve gotten lucky.